sonic-hip-attack:

socialistictendencies:

santorum2016:

depressingfacts:

fuckyeahjesse:

depressingfacts:

leftlibertarian:

santorum2016:

leftlibertarian:

santorum2016:

It upsets me greatly that there are so many racist black supremacists on tumblr (people like dionthesocialist and socialistictendencies). I wish colored folks would get past this whole racism thing and view us as individuals. Race doesn’t define people you know. 

If you say colored folk one more time, I’m going to punch your cracker, racist, ignorant fucker ass through my fucking computer.

And that last part of your post was so fucking dumb, that it does not warrant an intelligent response.

Here’s an example of what I was talking about in my original post.

By the way, cracker is a racial slur so you really shouldn’t be the one to call me a racist.

You must be trolling me. You obviously don’t know the history of the word cracker, and if you think the history behind cracker even closely approaches the oppressive history associated with the term colored folk, you are an idiot.

I love when white people call cracker a racial slur.

Not really, it was an insult white people used to insult white people they didn’t like. But that’s such an extensive history of racial oppression. 

Great, now I really want white-on-white racism to be a thing… (not ethnocentrism, just straight up racism for both parties being white.)

Let’s call it the crackers vs the honkeys. That would be glorious. 

More examples of disgusting anti-white racism. I fear for the future of this country. I fear the day we become the minority in our own land. 

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAA

HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH

BWHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

why do you fear the day you become a minority?

are minorities treated badly or something? :D

I seriously wouldn’t bother with this santorum2016 fuckwad if I were you guys. It’s probably the same guy who used to have a tumblr called ‘savetheskunkapes’ whose page title was ‘Santorum 2012’ and who said the following to me:

“I just want to say I think it’s a shame your parents failed you so greatly. You are probably a child of divorce and you blame your father for your parents’ failed marriage. That blame and hatred of your father internalized and became misandry which led you to actually support the ideology of feminism which is the real culprit in the destruction of your family. Give your father a call, rebuild that relationship. You will become less angry and then you might learn how to properly use makeup and a man may actually want to marry you one day and then you will no longer have to be a feminist who hates all men because she’s really just frustrated that no one wants to marry her. It’s never too late to get on the right path. God bless!”

(Here’s the link of our whole delightful conversation)

(Source: stfuconservatives)

chelseacheshirecat:

aestheticrequiem:

A New Dark Age

Most scientists, on achieving high office, keep their public remarks to the bland and reassuring. Last week Nina Fedoroff, the president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), broke ranks in a spectacular manner.

She confessed that she was now “scared to death” by the anti-science movement that was spreading, uncontrolled, across the US and the rest of the western world.

“We are sliding back into a dark era,” she said. “And there seems little we can do about it. I am profoundly depressed at just how difficult it has become merely to get a realistic conversation started on issues such as climate change or genetically modified organisms.”

As Fedoroff pointed out, university and government researchers are hounded for arguing that rising carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere are changing the climate. Their emails are hacked while Facebook campaigns call for their dismissal from their posts, calls that are often backed by rightwing politicians. At the last Republican party debate in Florida, Rick Santorum insisted he should be the presidential nominee simply because he had cottoned on earlier than his rivals Newt Gingrich or Mitt Romney to the “hoax” of global warming.

“Those of us who grew up in the sixties, when we put men on the Moon, now have to watch as every Republican candidate for this year’s presidential election denies the science behind climate change and evolution. That is a staggering state of affairs and it is very worrying,” said Professor Naomi Oreskes, of the University of California, San Diego.

Oreskes is co-author, with Erik Conway, of Merchants of Doubt, an investigation into the links between corporate business interests and campaigns in the US aimed at blocking the introduction of environmental and medical measures such as bans on smoking and the use of DDT, laws to limit acid rain, legislation to end the depletion of ozone in the atmosphere and attempts to curb carbon dioxide emissions.

In each case, legislation was delayed by years, sometimes decades, thanks to the activities of a variety of foundations – such as the Heartland Institute – which are backed by energy companies such as Exxon and billionaires like Charles Koch.

These institutions, acting as covers for major energy corporations, are responsible for the onslaught that has deeply lowered the reputation of science in many people’s minds in America. This has come in the form of personal attacks on the reputations of scientists and television adverts that undermine environment laws. The Environmental Protection Agency, which is responsible for blocking mining and drilling proposals that might harm threatened species or habitats, has become a favourite target.

(Source: sunrec)